29/01/2025 - The rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented opportunities for organisations. Consider advanced customer interactions, refined fraud detection, and the optimization of business processes. However, the use of AI also raises significant (ethical) questions, especially when personal data is processed. A critical question is: can your organisation process personal data when developing or using an AI model? In this blog, we delve deeper into this issue.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) outlines principles that every processing of personal data must comply with, including data processing during the development and deployment of an AI model. One of these principles is that any processing of personal data must be based on a legal basis from Article 6 GDPR.
Although consent is often used as a legal basis, it is not always practical. In the context of an AI model, it is often challenging to identify every individual whose data is processed and to obtain their consent. Legitimate interest is therefore the most applicable legal basis in such cases. In a recent opinion, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) indicated that the legal basis of legitimate interest may be used by organisations under certain conditions when developing or deploying an AI model. This opinion builds upon the previously published EDPB Guidelines 1/2024 for processing personal data based on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR.
To rely on legitimate interest as a legal basis, an organisation must meet the following three cumulative conditions (the "three-step test"):
An organisation must carefully and thoroughly document in writing, prior to processing, that all three cumulative conditions are met.
In its opinion, the EDPB provides several examples of legitimate interests in the context of AI models. Developing a chatbot to serve website users, a system to detect fraudulent content or behaviour, or improving the detection of security threats are considered legitimate interests.
The three-step test can be complex, particularly the balancing of interests. For this reason, we’ll explore this step in more detail. In its opinion, the EDPB outlines several factors that play a role in balancing interests in the context of AI models. An AI model can have both negative and positive effects on these factors:
The relationship between the controller (the organisation developing or using the AI model) and the data subjects affects these factors. This relationship is partly determined by the origin of the personal data, whether it is collected directly from the data subject or obtained from another source, such as purchased data or information scraped from the internet.
If it is found that the interests and rights of the data subjects likely outweigh those of the controller, the controller can implement additional mitigating measures. These measures limit the (negative) impact of the AI model. Such measures go beyond the GDPR requirements and depend on the specific circumstances of the case. The EDPB mentions several examples:
An organisation wants to develop a chatbot to better serve their website users. The organisation develops the chatbot using scraping. This could involve craping the entire internet or a select number of specific websites. It poses significant challenges if the organisation chooses to scrape the entire internet. This involves processing personal data on a large scale and without differentiation. Moreover, it is virtually impossible to inform all data subjects about the use of their personal data. In such cases, very stringent additional measures are necessary. An alternative approach is to copy only a limited number of websites, such as the organisation’s own websites or an internal environment like the intranet. This approach makes it easier to inform data subjects and offer them the opportunity to object to the processing of their personal data.
Legitimate interest can serve as a legal basis for processing personal data when developing or deploying an AI model, but it requires careful consideration in advance. Failing to properly apply the three-step test may lead to the unlawful collection of personal data. This can result in reputational damage and possibly a fine from the supervisory authority. Do you need assistance with performing the three-step test? Feel free to contact Considerati.
Do you have any questions about the above or are you looking for Legal advice? Contact Considerati, we offer specialised advice and tailored support.
Our services ContactRecente blogs
Organisations will need to carefully evaluate how potential regulatory changes might impact their data handling practices, infrastructure decisions, and…